Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Video iPod to obsolete audiobooks?
"... according to a source at a major publishing house, they were just ordered to archive all their manuscripts -- every single one -- and send them over to Apple's Cupertino HQ"
I find this interesting on two levels:
- The Sony eBook reader and also the iRex reader both use e-Ink technology, which does not require any power to keep text on the screen between page turns, meaning really good battery life. I don't believe there is a color e-Ink technology yet, and certainly not one that could also display movies...
- There was another rumor that the next iPod would be able to speak using "uses famous actors' voices to perfectly pronounce even the weirdest song titles and band names", which folks at the time took to mean it would read album/band/track names to you
What if the read-back is actually intended for reading back electronic books?.

If you have ever listened to an audio-book (as I do all the time in the car), you'll know its a great way to catch up on your reading when you have a busy schedule. The problem is the lack of choice, as audio-books are typically only made for best sellers.
If Apple could make an eBook audio reader, you could download even some old or unpopular book in text form, and have your iPod read it to you verbally as you go about your business.
The "famous actors' voices" thing is especially poignant when it comes to audio books, as they are often read by actors/actresses (I assume because they have often been voice coached, and enunciate properly).
And because text compresses so much more than audio, you could get quite a few books even onto something like that next-gen eBook-reading iPod Shuffle.
The interesting thing about this is it really gives them a disruptive technology, allowing them to break their way to into the book market in a new way - something very impressive considering how Amazon.com and BN.com pretty much have the online book market sown up today.
2 Comments:
|
I like the thrust (titter) of your argument, makes sense completely. Did you ever buy that Apple stock? :P | ||
|
By Rich, at 7/27/2006 2:40 PM |
||
|
The compelling part of the argument is that it could work in all of their form factors right down to the Shuffle. | ||
|
By xmlguy, at 7/31/2006 2:48 PM |
||



